Ita/484/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Hfcl Infotel Ltd
High Court
09 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/484/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Hfcl Infotel Ltd
Date of order
09 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/484/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central-3 v. Hfcl Infotel Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
r-
-••(
$7^5.and7
^
•„,"L
*.IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEWJDELHI
11^218/2018;
^
+.
PR;COMMiSSIONiEKdF INCOME.TAX-3;NEWDEtHI " . .. , , /,
'-•Appellant.'' •
; ' Through : Mr. Asheesh'Jain,Sr^StandingCounsel\
\
"
• >
V
versus-,'
versus-,HFQLiNFOT<D. ;^^ThroughL None'
......Respondent.
.V
/-
AND
ITA 48^/201.8
THE-PR.COMMISSIONEROFlNCbMETAX•;CENTRAL-3' ,', '., • •-i
^
-
., • •-iAppellant.:Mr., Ruchir Bhatia, ,Sr. ..Standing ,:'Couhser'\•;. ;'» -'^''^^spondent' None-,,,..•; •'
• :
•Through
'
.
,' ^ • V'•'•''versus'-.' -HFCL INFOTELLTtt
•
•
•••'Through'
' None-,,,..
CORAM:'-I/-"'HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
•'-•'•ORDER- i ,
^ ^
%09.07.2018CM No. 16032/2018 in ITA No. 484/2bl8CM No. 16032/2018 in ITA No. 484/2bl8
rV
>
' This is an applicationfor condonationof xlelay of 90 days in ~\re-filingofthe appeal. .'.; \; ,•,
, ^.., Forthe reasonsstatedin the appiication,delayin re^fiUngofthe . .;appeal is allowed;/;<•:,, ,> .. .,"
I \
.
>
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedBy:AMULYA
1 •
•
Exemption',allowed, subject to all. just exceptions..^ The;,'apjjlibatiohis disposed of.'.;V--,
; : .
ITA No.2i8/2018and ITA No. 484/2018
-
, . ;;ITA Nos.,484/2018;and 2.18/2018"filedby the.Revenuein thecase of HFCL Infotel Limited,- pertain to assessmentyears 2008-09ti-Xi.
'
'
'I,
•
*'I
^'
M'• 'm-
'I
' ;
''I,•*'I^'M'• 'm--' ;theiissuesraisedin the presentappealsrelateto (i) claiftiunder.Section 35ABB of the Income Tax Act, ,l'96i, (ii) disallowanceofinterest paidto, the "department - of, telecommunication, '(iii)disallowance,of interest as' expense by treating it.as cajpitalwork in ,progressand (iy) additionsmade on.'accountof membership.fee paid. to thevariousclubs. ,^//•' .i\
-
'
, ' , ,The'^-aforesaidrissuesare covered by;decisions, of.this/Court in ,.favour of.the resjpondeht/aSsesseein.-ITA;No. 487/2018 and other ^' connected matters decided on 25.04.2018 and ITA'^Nos.459/2018 and• ,460/2018.decide^on 16;0402018: ./ : >- V;
'
^
•
., - In view.,'of the aforesaidacceptedposition^we do npt find any •
. -"
. merit in the aforesaidappealsand the same are dismissed.>No order ,astoxosts.'• •/ • ~.r
'
.rSANJIV KHANNA, JCHANDMR-SHEKHAR,J
JULY O^, 2018/b
'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.