Ita/488/2019 Of M/S Intergarden(India) Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
16 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/488/2019 Of M/S Intergarden(India) Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/488/2019 Of M/S Intergarden(India) Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in case need arises in future.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
I.T.A.No.488 /2019
BETWEEN:
M/s.Intergarden (India) Pvt. Ltd., #No.447, Sri Sai Heights, 17[th] Cross, 17[th] Main, 4[th] Sector, HSR Layout, Bengaluru-560 102. … APPELLANT
(By Smt.Sonali Shendge, Advocate)
AND:
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 11(3), Bangalore.
… RESPONDENT
(By Sri E.I.Sanmathi, Advocate)
This Income Tax Appeal is filed under section 260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 15.03.2019 passed in ITA No.2199/Bang/2017 (Annexure-A), for the Assessment Year 2010-2011, praying to allow the appeal and set aside the order of the Tribunal dated 15.03.2019 passed in ITA No.2199/Bang/2017 (Annexure-A), for the Assessment
Year 2010-2011 to the extent of the question raised above, etc.
This appeal coming on for Hearing, this day, Satish Chandra Sharma J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
1. Smt. Sonali Shendge, learned Counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal as the assessee has approached the department under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
2. Prayer is granted. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
with liberty to revive the same in case need arises in future.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
KK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.