Ita/495/2014 Of Bharti Airtel Limited v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
25 Feb 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/495/2014 Of Bharti Airtel Limited v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
25 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/495/2014 Of Bharti Airtel Limited v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty asprayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~58& 59
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 494/2014+ITA 495/2014
versus
THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
RespondentThrough: Mr.Kamal Sawhney and Mr. SanjayKumar, Advs.
1. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the appellant thatapplications under Section 254 (2) are pending before the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal (ITAT) in respect of certain alterations as certainarguments could not be considered at the time of disposal of the appealswhich are subject matters of the Tribunal proceedings.
2. In these circumstances, the Court is of the opinion that the appellantswill approach this Court in case final order of rectification is made. Thelearned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the presentappeals but with further liberty to approach this Court and urge all groundsincluding the ground urged in the present appeals, if need arises.
3. Liberty granted. It is open to the appellants to agitate their grievancesin respect of the order to be made by the ITAT as well as any other groundswhich are the subject matters of the present appeals.
4. The appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty asprayed for.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
FEBRUARY 25, 2015
mr
RK GUBA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.