Ita/5014/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bilagi Pattana Sahakari
High Court
19 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/5014/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bilagi Pattana Sahakari
Date of order
19 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/5014/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bilagi Pattana Sahakari, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: THIS ITA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY,RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel submits that the appeal is not maintainablein view of the board circular dated 10.12.2015 in Circular No.?1of 2015 with regard to the monetary limits in filing the appeal] In view of the...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKDHARWAD BENCH
ON THE 19 DAY OF JANUARY, 2017
BEEBEO
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
ITA NO©O.5014 OF 20
BETWERE
THER COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TADR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELGAUM
(BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
APPRELLANT
AND
M/S BILAGI PATTANA SAHAKARIBANK NIYAMIT, NEAR BUS STAND,BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587116
(BY SRI. A SHANKAR, SRI. M.LAVA, ANDSRISHASHANK HEGDE, ADVS.)|
— RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILBD UNDER SECTION 260A OF THEINCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED IN ITANO.1073/BANG/2012 DATED 24.05.2013 ON THE FILE OF THEINCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH ‘C’,BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED BY THEASSESSEE.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY,RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel submits that the appeal is not maintainablein view of the board circular dated 10.12.2015 in Circular No.?1of 2015 with regard to the monetary limits in filing the appeal]
In view of the submission made, appeal is dismissed as notmaintainable.
Sd/-JUDGE
Rsh
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue