Ita/5015/2012 Of The Commissioner Of The Income Tax v. M/S. Flowserve Microfinish Valves Pvt. Ltd
High Court
17 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/5015/2012 Of The Commissioner Of The Income Tax v. M/S. Flowserve Microfinish Valves Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
17 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/5015/2012 Of The Commissioner Of The Income Tax v. M/S. Flowserve Microfinish Valves Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, for the reasons stated in I.T.A.No.475/2009 this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF OCTOBER 2012
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. L. MANJUNATHANDTHE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
BETWEEN!
I.T.A. No. 5015/2012
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Navanagar, Hubli.Navanagar, Hubli.
2.The Dy. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Circle-2(1),Hubli.Income Tax, Circle-2(1),Hubli.
(by Sri Y.V. Raviraj, Advocate)
Appellants
and
M/s Flowserve MicrofinishValves Pvt. Ltd.,Industrial Area, Gokul Road,Hubli.
Respondent
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC.260-A OF THE INCOMETAX ACT, 1961, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.02.2012PASSED IN ITA NO.477/BANG/2011 ON THE FILE OF THEINCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘A’ BENCH, BANGALORE,AND BIC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON KOR ORDERS REGARDINGNON COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE OBJECTIONS THIS DAY,K.L.MANJUNATH, J,DELIVERED THR FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
In the connected appeal in I.T.A. No. 475/2009, aco-ordinate Bench of this Court on 11.11.2011, inwhich, one of us (Justice K.L. Manjunath) is a party,wherein the substantial question of law raised isanswered against the revenue and in favour of therespondent. Therefore, for the reasons stated in I.T.A.No.475/2009 this appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-JUDGE
bvv
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue