Ita/503/2019 Of M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer (Osd)(Tds)
High Court
06 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/503/2019 Of M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer (Osd)(Tds)
Date of order
06 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/503/2019 Of M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer (Osd)(Tds), the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject to above observations. sd Sd/-| JUDGE Sd/-.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019.
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR|
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
1.T.A. NO.503 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
M/s. Karnataka Power TransmissionCorporation Ltd..,Executive Engineer (Ele)TL & SS Division, Shantha Mansion,Gandhinagara,shivamogga-9//201-PAN: AABCK7281 M(Represented by its Director (Finance),Mr. Ashwin D Gowda, aged about 31 years,S/o. R.Danappa) |
... Appellan
(By Sri. Chythanya K.K., Advocate)
AND:
The Income Tax Officer (OSD)(TDS)_Large Tax Payers UnitJ.S.S.Towers, 100ft Ring Road,Banashankari III Stage, Phase 3,Banashankari, Bengaluru-S60085....Responden(By Sri. K.V.Aravind, Advocate)
This ITA is filed under Section 260 A of the IncomeTax Act 1961, arising out of the order dated 15.03.2019°passed in ITA Nos.2755 and 27596/Bang/2018 for theAssessment Year 2014-2015, praying to (a) Formulatethe substantial question of law stated above (b) Allowthe appeal and set aside the impugned order of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru ‘C’ Benchbearing in ITA Nos.2759 and 2756/Bang/2018 for theAssessment Year 2014-2015, dated 15.03.2019 (c) Passsuch other suitable orders including order as to costs as"this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to grant in the factsand circumstances of the case in the interest of justiceand equity.
This ITA coming on for admission this day,Aravind Kumar,J.,passed the following:-_
JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for appellant has sought for
withdrawal of appeal with a prayer to keep open allerounds urged in the appeal on merits of case. It has.
been stated in the memo to the following effect.
“It 1s submitted the department hadfiled Appeals against the Tribunal order inITA Nos.s66 to 640/2018 and ITA 69566957/2018, which were dismissed on thebasis of low tax effect by an order dated31.10.2019. The Appellant against the saidTribunal order (to the extent prejudice) had)filed CTrOSSappeals1nITANos. 72TO 145/2019.|
The Appellant in anticipation that thedepartment might file appeals against theother two Tribunal orders and consideringthe limitation filed appeals against those two.Tribunal orders in ITA Nos.394 to 433/2019and ITA Nos.491 to 9526/2019. It issubmitted that against the said Tribunalorders the department did not file appeals”.|
Since|themainappeals oT|thedepartment are dismissed, the Appellant donot want to pursue the above appeals and_a? Cross appeals
2. In the light of afore stated statement made by
the assessee and odri. K.V.Aravind, learned PanelCounsel representing Revenue not disputing the factthat ITA.No.566-640/2018, 6560/2018 and 6097/201filed by Revenue having been withdrawn, we deem itproper to permit the appellant to withdraw this appealwithout expressing any opinion on merits of the caseand contentions of both parties including grounds urgedin this appeal are kept open to be adjudicated if needarises in future.
Hence, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject
to above observations.
sd
Sd/-|
JUDGE
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.