Case Law › High Court › Ita/505/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/505/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kottayam v. M/S.premier Marine Exports,Alappuzha

High Court 17 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

17 Jul 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/505/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kottayam v. M/S.premier Marine Exports,Alappuzha, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2009 / 26TH ASHADHA 1931 ITA.No. 505 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.186/COCH/2002 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- M/S.PREMIER MARINE EXPORTS, CHANDIROOR, ALAPPUZHA. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 505 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair,J. At the request of standing counsel for the revenue, I.T.Appeal isdismissed as withdrawn leaving freedom to the appellant to claimeligible refund of court fee. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (C. K. ABDUL REHIM) Judge. kk

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.