Ita/509/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kannur v. M/S.k. Viswanatha Subraya Kamath
High Court
17 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/509/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kannur v. M/S.k. Viswanatha Subraya Kamath
Date of order
17 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/509/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kannur v. M/S.k. Viswanatha Subraya Kamath, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Since we have taken the view that payment of contribution to ESI and PF before filing return will be sufficient under Section 43B of theAct, we dismiss the departmental appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
FRIDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2009 / 26TH ASHADHA 1931
ITA.No. 509 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.893/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
-----------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KANNUR
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
M/S. K.VISWANATHA SUBRAYA KAMATH &SONS
SAKTHI NAGAR, MANGALORE.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 17/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 509 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 17th day of July, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair,J.
Since we have taken the view that payment of contribution to ESI
and PF before filing return will be sufficient under Section 43B of theAct, we dismiss the departmental appeal.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(C. K. ABDUL REHIM)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.