Ita/509/2013 Of Bosch Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
16 Jun 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/509/2013 Of Bosch Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/509/2013 Of Bosch Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
I.T.A. NO.509 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
BOSCH LIMITED P.O. BOX NO.3000, HOSUR ROAD, ADUGODI, BANGALORE-560 030, REPRESENTED BY ITS JOINT MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. SOUMITRA BHATTACHARYA.
(BY MISS MAHIMA GOUD, ADVOCATE FOR SRI T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
... APPELLANT
AND:
1 . THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BANGALORE-560 085.
2 . THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12(1) 14/3 RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, OPPOSITE RBI, BANGALORE-560 001.
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
... RESPONDENTS
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.06.2013 PASSED IN ITA NO.648 & 649/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-03 & 2003-04, PRAYING TO:
(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN.
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.648 & 649/BANG/2010 DATED 07/06/2013, (ANNEXURE-G) TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED THEREIN.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DAY,
JUDGMENT
Miss Mahima Goud, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the Revenue.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the dispute in this appeal has been amicably settled under the provisions of the “Vivad Se Vishwas’ scheme.
The aforesaid submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
HR
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue