Case LawHigh Court › Ita/511/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/511/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central)-Ii v. Spn Milk Products Industries Pvt. Ltd

High Court 08 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/511/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central)-Ii v. Spn Milk Products Industries Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
08 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/511/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central)-Ii v. Spn Milk Products Industries Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal along with the pending applications is consequently dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 511/2016 & C.M.Nos.27560-27561/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-II ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.Standing Counsel and Mr.Puneet Rai, Jr.Standing Counsel. versus SPN MILK PRODUCTS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R% 08.08.2016 In this appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue urges that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) fell into error in holding the order of assessment made against the original company (SPN Milk Products Industries Pvt.Ltd.) which was subsequently amalgamated with M/s Sanskar Projects and Housing Ltd.) as erroneous. The facts pertinent to the said issue are that during the pendency of block assessment, the original assessee was amalgamated with M/s Sanskar Projects and Housing Limited. The orders of the lower authorities disclosed that this fact was brought to the notice of the Revenue which proceeded in computing the assessment against the original assessee though no longer in existence. The –Commissioner upheld the contentions of the transferee company which was confirmed by the ITAT. The question of law sought to be urged is covered by several decisions of this court including Spice Entertainment Ltd. vs. CITITA No.475/2011 decided on 03.08.2011 and CIT vs. Micron Steels P. Ltd. (2015) 372 ITR 386 (Delhi). Given that the question of law is covered and further that as against the same assessee the revenue had suffered dismissal in a previous decision of this court for the previous assessment year in ITA No.239/2016, this court finds no merit in the appeal. The appeal along with the pending applications is consequently dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J AUGUST 08, 2016 rb NAJMI WAZIRI, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan