Case Law › High Court › Ita/51/2022 Of Principal Commissioner Of...

Ita/51/2022 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Swadesh Developers And Builder Premier

High Court 30 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_jbp

Parties

Date of order

30 Jun 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/51/2022 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Swadesh Developers And Builder Premier, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Signature Not VerifiedSAN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRAON THE 30[th] OF JUNE, 2022 INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 51 of 2022 Between:- PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL BHOPAL (M.P.) .....APPELLANT (BY SHRI SANJAY LAL - ADVOCATE - ABSENT) ANDM/S SWADESH DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERPREMIER ORCHARD BEHIND PEOPLES MALL,OPP. BMHRC, KAROND BY PASS ROAD BHOPAL .....RESPONDENT This appeal coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following: ORDER None appears for the appellant. Even after granting sufficient time, defaults have not been cured. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. (RAVI MALIMATH)CHIEF JUSTICE (VISHAL MISHRA)JUDGE SKM

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.