Ita/5/2010 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
24 Feb 2011 In favour of: Partly
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/5/2010 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Partly Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/5/2010 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) partly allowed the appeal. The decision went partly in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
THURSDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1932
ITA.No. 5 of 2010()
-------------------
ITA.879/COACH/2004 of INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH,
COCHIN.
....................
APPELLANT:
----------------------
THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD.,
ST.MARYS COLLEGE ROAD, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.K.VINOD CHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CIRCLE I (1) RANGE-1, TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC,INCOME TAX
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 24/02/2011 ALONG WITH ITA NO.6 OF 2010,THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ.= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =I.T.A. Nos. 5 & 6 of 2010= = = = = = = = = = = == == = = = = DATED THIS, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011.
J U D G M E N T
C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J.
All the issues raised in these connected appeals are covered by ourjudgments partly in favour of the assessee and partly against them. So far asvaluation of unquoted Government security is concerned, the decision is infavour of the assessee. and the same is rendered in I.T.A. 234 of 2009. Sofar as disallowance under Section 14A is concerned we have held in ourjudgment in I.T.A. 720/2009 that assessments completed could not berevised for disallowance u/s. 14A for any period prior to 2001-2002. So faras the last issue is concerned, ie. addition in block assessment under Section115JA, this Court directed the assessing officer to consider application ofclause (f) of Section 115JA and make assessment in accordance with thesaid provision.
Following the above judgments, we allow these appeals in part byreversing the orders of the Tribunal to the extent such orders are against thedecisions above stated and direct the assessing officer to modify the
ITA NOS. 5 & 6/2010
assessment suitably, particularly under Section 115JA after considering theapplication of sub-clause (f) to the provision in the case of the assessee.
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,(JUDGE)
P.S. GOPINATHAN, (JUDGE)
knc/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.