Case LawHigh Court › Ita/5/2010 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank L...

Ita/5/2010 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 24 Feb 2011 In favour of: Partly
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/5/2010 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Partly Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/5/2010 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) partly allowed the appeal. The decision went partly in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1932 ITA.No. 5 of 2010() ------------------- ITA.879/COACH/2004 of INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN. .................... APPELLANT: ---------------------- THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD., ST.MARYS COLLEGE ROAD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.VINOD CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE I (1) RANGE-1, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC,INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/02/2011 ALONG WITH ITA NO.6 OF 2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ.= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =I.T.A. Nos. 5 & 6 of 2010= = = = = = = = = = = == == = = = = DATED THIS, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011. J U D G M E N T C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J. All the issues raised in these connected appeals are covered by ourjudgments partly in favour of the assessee and partly against them. So far asvaluation of unquoted Government security is concerned, the decision is infavour of the assessee. and the same is rendered in I.T.A. 234 of 2009. Sofar as disallowance under Section 14A is concerned we have held in ourjudgment in I.T.A. 720/2009 that assessments completed could not berevised for disallowance u/s. 14A for any period prior to 2001-2002. So faras the last issue is concerned, ie. addition in block assessment under Section115JA, this Court directed the assessing officer to consider application ofclause (f) of Section 115JA and make assessment in accordance with thesaid provision. Following the above judgments, we allow these appeals in part byreversing the orders of the Tribunal to the extent such orders are against thedecisions above stated and direct the assessing officer to modify the ITA NOS. 5 & 6/2010 assessment suitably, particularly under Section 115JA after considering theapplication of sub-clause (f) to the provision in the case of the assessee. C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,(JUDGE) P.S. GOPINATHAN, (JUDGE) knc/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan