Ita/5/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Omwati Goyal
High Court
08 Nov 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Ita/5/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Omwati Goyal
Date of order
08 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/5/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Omwati Goyal, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty asprayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
The High Court Of Madhya PradeshITA-5-2014
(COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVs SMT. OMWATI GOYAL)
28
[08][-][11][-][2019]Jabalpur, Dated :
Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the appellant.
I.A.No.13867/2019 for withdrawal of the appeal.
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the taxeffect involved is Rs.13,08,551/-, he has instructions to withdraw the presentappeal in view of the Circular No.17/2019 dated 8.8.2019 issued by theGovernment of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), New Delhi. However, he prayed thatliberty be granted to the Revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal, in case something survives therein.
In view of above, I.A.No.13867/2019 is allowed.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty asprayed for.
It is, however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the Revenueshall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits.Further, the legal issue as claimed by the Revenue is being left open to beadjudicated in an appropriate case
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)CHIEF JUSTICE
(SANJAY YADAV)JUDGE
vivek
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.