Case LawHigh Court › Ita/52/2010 Of Smt.p.haseena v. Commissi...

Ita/52/2010 Of Smt.p.haseena v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 23 Mar 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/52/2010 Of Smt.p.haseena v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/52/2010 Of Smt.p.haseena v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the circumstances, for the reasons assigned by us inI.T.A.No.51 of 2010, these appeals are also dismissed at theadmission stage.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2010 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1932 ITA.No. 52 of 2010 ------------------------ ITA.576/COCH/2008 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT IN ITA ---------------------------------------------- SMT.P.HASEENA, CHITTAKATH POTTAMMEL HOUSE, VALAVANNUR, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN ITA --------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOZHIKODE. BY STANDING COUNSEL, GOVT. OF INDIA (TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2010 ALONG WITH ITA NO.53/2010 AND CONNECTED MATTERS, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.R.Raman, J. ------------------------------------------ I.T.A. Nos.52, 53, 54 & 57 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23[rd ] day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT J.Chelameswar, C.J. The issue involved in these appeals is identical with theissue involved in I.T.A.No.51 of 2010. Though the parties aredifferent and the assessment years are also different, the order of theTribunal which is under challenge in all these appeals is a commonorder. In the circumstances, for the reasons assigned by us inI.T.A.No.51 of 2010, these appeals are also dismissed at theadmission stage. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice P.R.Raman, Judge vns
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan