Case LawHigh Court › Ita/530/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/530/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kozhikode v. T.k. Abdul Jamal, Wayanad Dist

High Court 20 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/530/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kozhikode v. T.k. Abdul Jamal, Wayanad Dist
Date of order
20 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/530/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kozhikode v. T.k. Abdul Jamal, Wayanad Dist, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The question raised is whether assessment of the cash recoveredfrom the respondent by the Police and handed over to the departmentwas rightly cancelled by the Tribunal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM ITA.No. 530 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.1093/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/REVENUE ------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): ASSESSEE ----------------------- SRI.T.K.ABDUL JAMAL, THALATHIKANDY HOUSE, MANICHIRA, POOMALA P.O. SULTHAN BATHERY, WYANAD DISTRICT -673592. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.530 of 2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The question raised is whether assessment of the cash recoveredfrom the respondent by the Police and handed over to the departmentwas rightly cancelled by the Tribunal. We have heard StandingCounsel appearing for the appellant and have gone through the order ofthe Tribunal. We are in complete agreement with the finding of theTribunal that when the respondent put forward a case that the amountreally belongs to his employer and sale proceeds of the cement, it wasthe duty of the Assessing Officer to conduct enquiry againstM/s.Ashique Enterprises under whom respondent was stated to beemployed. We do not find any question of law arising from the conclusions reached by the Tribunal. Consequently appeal isdismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge pms C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan