Ita/530/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kozhikode v. T.k. Abdul Jamal, Wayanad Dist
High Court
20 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/530/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kozhikode v. T.k. Abdul Jamal, Wayanad Dist
Date of order
20 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/530/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kozhikode v. T.k. Abdul Jamal, Wayanad Dist, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question raised is whether assessment of the cash recoveredfrom the respondent by the Police and handed over to the departmentwas rightly cancelled by the Tribunal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
& MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
ITA.No. 530 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.1093/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/REVENUE
-------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,
KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): ASSESSEE
-----------------------
SRI.T.K.ABDUL JAMAL, THALATHIKANDY
HOUSE, MANICHIRA, POOMALA P.O.
SULTHAN BATHERY, WYANAD DISTRICT -673592.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 20/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.530 of 2009
....................................................................
Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The question raised is whether assessment of the cash recoveredfrom the respondent by the Police and handed over to the departmentwas rightly cancelled by the Tribunal. We have heard StandingCounsel appearing for the appellant and have gone through the order ofthe Tribunal. We are in complete agreement with the finding of theTribunal that when the respondent put forward a case that the amountreally belongs to his employer and sale proceeds of the cement, it wasthe duty of the Assessing Officer to conduct enquiry againstM/s.Ashique Enterprises under whom respondent was stated to beemployed. We do not find any question of law arising from the
conclusions reached by the Tribunal. Consequently appeal isdismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.