Ita/53/2009 Of Shri.m.k.raghu,Eroor,Tripunithura,Ekm v. The Asst.commr.of Income Tax,Ernakulam
High Court
13 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/53/2009 Of Shri.m.k.raghu,Eroor,Tripunithura,Ekm v. The Asst.commr.of Income Tax,Ernakulam
Date of order
13 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/53/2009 Of Shri.m.k.raghu,Eroor,Tripunithura,Ekm v. The Asst.commr.of Income Tax,Ernakulam, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
FRIDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2009 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1930
ITA.No. 53 of 2009()
--------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16/10/2008 IN ITA.344/COCH/2006 IN
CO.69/COCH/2006 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
-----------------------------
SHRI.M.K.RAGHU,
MANAKKAPADATHU, KOPPARAMBU, EROOR,
TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.VINOD CHANDRAN
SMT.A.S.BEENU
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SC
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 13/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.53 of 2009
....................................................................
Dated this the 13th day of March, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since in assessee's own case pertaining to the same issue thiscourt granted partial relief in I.T.A. No.35/2009, this appeal is alsodisposed of following the said judgment with direction to therespondent to grant relief in terms of the said judgment.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
K.SURENDRA MOHANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.