Case LawHigh Court › Ita/538/2013 Of C K Sharma v. Income Tax...

Ita/538/2013 Of C K Sharma v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 22 Apr 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/538/2013 Of C K Sharma v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/538/2013 Of C K Sharma v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: In the circumstances, this|appeal is disposed of as not pressedwith liberty as prayed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. DATED THIS THE 227 DAY OF APRIL 2014. PRESENT THE HON‘'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE AND| THE HON‘'BLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHARITA.NO.538/ 2013 BETWEEN CK SHARMA.NOQ.206,5TH MAIN, III BLOCKJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560011PRESENTLY RESIDING ATNO.17, PRESTIGE CEDARSJ CONVENT ROAD|BANGALORE 560025 APPELLANT. (BY SRI R B KRISHNA, ADV.,)| AND INCOME TAX OFFICER.INTERNATIONAL TAX WARD 19(2).BANGALORE.PRESENTLY AT ITO, WARD 19(2)BANGALORE, 14/3, 6TH FLOOR|RP BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD.BANGALORE 560001 ... RESPONDENT | (BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADV.,)| THIS ITA UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961,|ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:31/07/2013 PASSED IN ITA.NO.752/BANG/2008, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99 PRAYINGTO: 1. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND. ANSWER THE SAME 2. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE.ORDER DATED:31/07/2013 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE.TRIBUNAL NO. 752/BANG/2008 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99.TO THE EXTENT TO WHICH SUCH ORDER [IS AGAINST THEAPPELLANT.. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR’ ADMISSION, THIS DAY, | Dilip B. Bnosale J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2.Mr.R.B.Krisnhna, learned counsel appearing forthe appellant, at the outset, submits that if the Revenue is.not carrying the order, impugned in the present appeal, in|appeal before this Court, he has instructions not to pressthis appeal. Further, ne seeks liberty to the appellant for)revival of his appeal in the event the Revenue files appealon merits against the impugned order. ‘3.Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel appearing forthe revenue, on instructions, submits that so far the|Department has not filed any appeal and that it does not propose to file appeal against the order impugned in thepresent appeal. In the circumstances, this|appeal is disposed of as not pressedwith liberty as prayed. TL Sd/-.JUDGE| Sd/-. JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan