Ita/539/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri S S Gopalakrishnan
High Court
09 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/539/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri S S Gopalakrishnan
Date of order
09 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/539/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri S S Gopalakrishnan, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE O0 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2012.
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SREEDHAR RAO|
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTISCE B.V.PINTO
INCOME-TAX APPEAL NO.539/2007|
BBRTWER
1.THR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXCR BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBANGALORECR BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBANGALORE
2.THER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONBR OF INCOMB TAXCIRCLE 14(1)|CR BUILDINGQUEENS ROADCIRCLE 14(1)|CR BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE _. APPKBLLANTS
(BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND
SRI S S GOPALAKRISHNAN
NO.69, I PHASE|
ADARSHA PALM MBADOWSWHITBKRFIBL
BANGALORE —. RBSPONDBENT
(BY SRI. A SHANKAR, ADV.)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATBD 29-03-2007 PASSED IN]
ITA NO.3803/BANG/2005 FOR THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD2000-01, PRAYING TO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OFLAW STATED THEREIN,
Il ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER.PASSED BY ITAT BANGALORE, IN ITA NO.303/BANG/2005DATED 29-03-2007 CONFIRMING THERE ORDER OF THAPPBLLATK COMMISSIONBR & CONFIRM THR ORDER|PASSED BY THE AssT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,|CIRCLE-14(1), BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF)JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS [TA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS.DAY,SREEDHAR RAO J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JU DBGMENT
The amendment to Section 17 (3) of the IncomeTax Act is a prospective effect from 1[82]April, 2003, andis an analogous provision in Section 28(va) of _IncomeTax Act, 1961 was also introduced with effect from 1[82]April, 2003. The said provision is held to be inprospective effect. In the instant case, the assessee hadreceived a lump sum payment as non-competition feeaiter his retirement. The said payment is made prior tothe incorporation of Section 17(3) of I.T.Act with effectfrom l[82]April, 2003. As on that date, the said amount.
was not taxable. It is only after the amendment, thesaid amount has become taxable. In that view, thequestion of law formulated in the memorandum ofappeal is answered against the Revenue. Accordingly,
the appeal is dismissed.
Nv]
Sd/-|JUDGESd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.