Ita/542/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ice Network (P) Ltd
High Court
03 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/542/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ice Network (P) Ltd
Date of order
03 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/542/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ice Network (P) Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the decision of this Court, the appeal stands disposed of subject to decision of the Supreme Court to be rendered in the case of Ranka & Ranka in the SLP.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 03 DAY OF OCTOBER 2012
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
BETWEEN :
ITA No.542/2008
1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), No.59,HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOORBELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE.
2 THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER(TDS), WARD-16(2) No.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE.
APPELLANTS
( By Sri. G KAMALADHAR, ADV.)
AND :
M/S ICE NETWORK (P) LTDNO.647/10, BRINDAVAN COMPLEX,DR.RAJKUMAR ROAD,RAJAJINAGAR,BANGALORE. RESPONDENT
( By Sri S PARTHASARATHI, ADV.)
ITA filed u/S.260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 31/12/2007 passed in ITA No.1085/BNG/2007 by the ITAT Bangalore.
This ITA coming on for final hearing this day, K.SREEDHAR RAO, J, delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
In view of Circular-3/11, in the above appeal, the monetary limit is less than Rs.10 lakh. This Court in the case of Ranka and Rank reported in 72 DTR 270 (Kar) has held that Circular-3/11 applies to the pending case also and it is not permissible to contend that it has only a prospective effect. Since it would result in hostile discriminaton and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, the revenue has preferred SLP (Civil) No.27468/2012 before the Supreme Court, which is pending consideration.
In view of the decision of this Court, the appeal stands disposed of subject to decision of the Supreme Court to be rendered in the case of Ranka & Ranka in the SLP. If
the Supreme Court were to decide that Circular-3/11 has only prospective effect, the appellant is permitted to seek revival of the appeal for disposal in accordance with law laid down by Supreme Court.
Sd/-JUDGESd/-JUDGEbkm.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.