Ita/542/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ericsson India Pvt Ltd

13.09.2011 \ a ' {J t Present: Mr.Kamal [sawhney, ][Adv. ][for ][the ][Appellant/Revenue.]Mr.M'S.Sya|i, Sr'Adv. [with ][Ms.Mahua Ka|ra, Ms.Husna| ][Sya|i]and Mr.Rahul Sateeja, [Advocates ][for the]ResPondent/Assessee. CM No.5571/2011 [(for ][Condonation ][of ][Delay ][of ][473 ][days ][in ][re-filing the] "oo"u'ln"re is a detay of 473days in [re-fiting ][the ][appeal' ][The ][only]explanation [given ][is ][that the ][paper ][book ][was sent ][to the ][Department ][as] there was an objection [raised regarding ][the dim ][annexures.] We fail to appreciate that it [took ][one and half ][years ][to ][type ][the]annexures. This is hardly a reason [on ][the ][basis ][of ][which ][the ][delay ][ought ][to ][be]condoned. We are informed by learned [counsel ][for the ][respondent/assessee]that a fresh order has already [been ][passed ][by ][the ][assessing ][officer ][and]thus the appeal has become [infructuous.] We had [given ]time to [learned ][counsel ][for the ][appellanVrevenue, but] he has still'not been able to [get ]any [information ][from ][the ][Department.] Dismissed. + ITA No.542l2011 x Dismissed in view of what we have [observed ][aforesaid.] SEPTEMBER 13, 20LL dm Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMULYACertify that the digital file andphysical file have been compared andthe digital data is as per the physicalfile and no page is missing. 6r'€SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.() (?*e;ty'././ J.() (?*e;ty'./RAJ|V SHAKDHER, J. - f,nl [Ranet-t ][/'AAi' ]f "/n [/'/'l /* ][r""l'V ][)vv'a't] f [o,a* ][J+ t/tft ][t] - 6*A .n t+zzf* /LJ /' [snhT ][6^JtJ'.7ry]l6v