Ita/542/2014 Of M L Krupal (Huf) v. The Income-Tax Officer
High Court
01 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/542/2014 Of M L Krupal (Huf) v. The Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
01 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/542/2014 Of M L Krupal (Huf) v. The Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2071
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW AMYILT.A. NO.542 OF 2014BETWEEN:
M.L. KRUPAL (HUF)REP. BY KARTHA OF HUF.SRI. M.L. KRUPAL.AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.PROP: M/S. ASSOCIATED COFFEEBLV COMPLEX, SOMAWARPET-571236 KODAGU DISTRICT.
.... APPELLAN/
(BY MR. A. SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL WITH.MR. S. ANNAMALAI, ADV., FOR MR. M. LAVA, ADV.,).
AND*
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD-1, SRIVALLI BUILDING|CHICKPET, MADIKERI-571201..
(BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,)
.., RESPONDENT
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 18.07.2014 PASSEDIN ITA NO.584/BANG/2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07,PRAYING TQ: |
(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS.STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE.APPELLAN!. |
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO.THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY.TRIBUNAL, IN ITA NO.584/BANG/2011 DATED 18.07.2014.
THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
JUDGMENT
Mr.A.Shankar, learned Senior counsel for Mr.M.Lava,|learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for tne assessee nas filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record.
2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises.
Sd/-—JUDGE
Sd/-—JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.