Case LawHigh Court › Ita/543/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of I...

Ita/543/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cit(A) v. M/S Hasan Hajee & Co

High Court 28 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/543/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cit(A) v. M/S Hasan Hajee & Co
Date of order
28 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/543/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cit(A) v. M/S Hasan Hajee & Co, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 28 DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH| AND| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD| ITA NO. 543 OF 2018 BEI|WEEN 1.THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,CIT(A)C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA|MANGALURU - 575 OOL.C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA|MANGALURU - 575 OOL. 2.|THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER|WARD-1(1), PERSENT ADDRESSACIT, CIRCLE-1(1).C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA|MANGALURU - 575 OOL1.WARD-1(1), PERSENT ADDRESSACIT, CIRCLE-1(1).C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA|MANGALURU - 575 OOL1. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND K. V, ADVOCATE) AND" M/S. HASAN HAJEE & CO. NO. 20-38-678, NEAR OLD MUNICIPAL OFFICE,BUNDER, MANGALURU - 575 OO1. .. RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED JHE ADVOCATE FOR THEAPPELLANT HAS FILED THE ABOVE ITA / INCOME TAX.APPEAL UNDER SECTION260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961,ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12.04.2018 PASSED IN|C.O. NO. 40/PAN/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR:|2011-2012,PRAYINGTHIS.HON’ BLECOURT|TO.FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW.STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE|THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE|TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O. NO. 40/PAN/2017 DATED:17.04.7018 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE|COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY|THE.ASSISTANTCOMMISSIONER,OF|INCOME.TAX,CIRCLE-1(1), MANGALURU AND ETC,,. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THISDAY, RAVI MALIMATH J"FfDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT In view of the memo filed in Court today, the appealIS dismissed as witndrawn. SD/- SD/- JUDGE JUDGE| NV|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan