Ita/543/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cit(A) v. M/S Hasan Hajee & Co
High Court
28 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/543/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cit(A) v. M/S Hasan Hajee & Co
Date of order
28 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/543/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cit(A) v. M/S Hasan Hajee & Co, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 28 DAY OF JANUARY, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD|
ITA NO. 543 OF 2018
BEI|WEEN
1.THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,CIT(A)C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA|MANGALURU - 575 OOL.C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA|MANGALURU - 575 OOL.
2.|THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER|WARD-1(1), PERSENT ADDRESSACIT, CIRCLE-1(1).C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA|MANGALURU - 575 OOL1.WARD-1(1), PERSENT ADDRESSACIT, CIRCLE-1(1).C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA|MANGALURU - 575 OOL1.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. ARAVIND K. V, ADVOCATE)
AND"
M/S. HASAN HAJEE & CO.
NO. 20-38-678, NEAR OLD MUNICIPAL OFFICE,BUNDER, MANGALURU - 575 OO1.
.. RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED JHE ADVOCATE FOR THEAPPELLANT HAS FILED THE ABOVE ITA / INCOME TAX.APPEAL UNDER SECTION260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961,ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12.04.2018 PASSED IN|C.O. NO. 40/PAN/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR:|2011-2012,PRAYINGTHIS.HON’ BLECOURT|TO.FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW.STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE|THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE|TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O. NO. 40/PAN/2017 DATED:17.04.7018 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE|COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY|THE.ASSISTANTCOMMISSIONER,OF|INCOME.TAX,CIRCLE-1(1), MANGALURU AND ETC,,.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THISDAY, RAVI MALIMATH J"FfDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
In view of the memo filed in Court today, the appealIS dismissed as witndrawn.
SD/- SD/-
JUDGE JUDGE|
NV|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.