Case LawHigh Court › Ita/55/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/55/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut v. Shri.p.p.bhaskaran

High Court 06 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/55/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut v. Shri.p.p.bhaskaran
Date of order
06 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/55/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut v. Shri.p.p.bhaskaran, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly,the appeals are dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/16TH JYAISHTA, 1938 ITA.No. 55 of 2012 () ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 212/COCH/2011 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 22-09-2011 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT : ---------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALICUT. BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT : ------------------------- SHRI.P.P.BHASKARAN ROMA ELECTRICALS, PARAKKAL, MAHE, PIN-673 310. R BY ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) R BY ADV. SMT.NISHA JOHN R BY ADV. SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN R BY ADV. SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-06-2016,ALONG WITH ITA.111/12, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ. -----------------------------------I.T.A.Nos.55 & 111 of 2012----------------------------------- Dated this the 6[th] day of June, 2016 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. The captioned appeals are filed by the Revenueand the assessee challenging the order passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench inITA.212/11 concerning the assessment year 2006-07. It is submitted by both sides that the Tribunalhas already recalled the order and that therefore,these appeals have become infructuous. Accordingly,the appeals are dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, Judge. kkb. /TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan