Ita/55/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut v. Shri.p.p.bhaskaran
High Court
06 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/55/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut v. Shri.p.p.bhaskaran
Date of order
06 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/55/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut v. Shri.p.p.bhaskaran, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly,the appeals are dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/16TH JYAISHTA, 1938
ITA.No. 55 of 2012 ()
----------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 212/COCH/2011 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 22-09-2011
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT :
----------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CALICUT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT :
-------------------------
SHRI.P.P.BHASKARAN
ROMA ELECTRICALS, PARAKKAL, MAHE, PIN-673 310.
R BY ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) R BY ADV. SMT.NISHA JOHN R BY ADV. SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN R BY ADV. SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-06-2016,ALONG WITH ITA.111/12, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ.
-----------------------------------I.T.A.Nos.55 & 111 of 2012----------------------------------- Dated this the 6[th] day of June, 2016
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
The captioned appeals are filed by the Revenueand the assessee challenging the order passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench inITA.212/11 concerning the assessment year 2006-07.
It is submitted by both sides that the Tribunalhas already recalled the order and that therefore,these appeals have become infructuous. Accordingly,the appeals are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, Judge.
kkb.
/TRUE COPY/
PS TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.