Case LawHigh Court › Ita/552/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/552/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kannur v. M/S Jasmine Vastharalaya, Mainr Road,Kel

High Court 15 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/552/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kannur v. M/S Jasmine Vastharalaya, Mainr Road,Kel
Date of order
15 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/552/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kannur v. M/S Jasmine Vastharalaya, Mainr Road,Kel, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 24TH BHADRA 1931 ITA.No. 552 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.626/COCH/2006 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KANNUR BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- M/S.JASMINE VASTHRALAYA, MAIN ROAD, KELAKAM. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/09/2009, ALONG WITH ITA 1194 & 1215 OF 2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No.552, 1194 & 1215 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Appeals are filed against orders of the Tribunal declining toentertain the appeals because the tax involved is below the thresholdlimit for filing appeal under CBDT norms. Even though standingcounsel submitted that the cases fall under exceptional clause of thenotification, we do not find that the claim is tenable because under theimpugned orders the first appellate authority declared eligibility of therespondent for assessment as a registered firm. Consequently, wedismiss the appeals. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan