Ita/562/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Eastman Industries
High Court
28 Sep 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/562/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Eastman Industries
Date of order
28 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/562/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Eastman Industries, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
FSR S
CM-20902-CI1[-2018 in/andITA No.562 of 2006 (O&M)Date of Decision: 28.09.2018
FSR S
Commissioner of Income-tax, Ludhiana...Appellant
VS|
... Respondent|
Eastman Industries
KK O
Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Surya KantHon’ble Mr.Justice Sudip Ahluwalia
FE SE
Present:Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant ©
Mr. Sunil Kumar Mukhi, Advocate for the respondent
FE SE
SURYA KANT J. (Oral)
&'(The prayer in this application is to dismiss the appeal in view ofthe recent Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes vide which ithas been directed that the appeals before the High Court shall not be filed incases where tax effect is less than=50 lacs.
&/(Learned counsel for Revenue states that the tax effect involvedin this case is)a39,55,479/- and he does not want to press this appeal onmerits.
&-(In view of the CBDT Circular, the application is allowed andthe instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed. As prayed for by learnedcounsel for the appellant, liberty is granted to the Revenue to seek revival ofthe appeal, if need be, in the changed circumstances. The question of law isalso kept open. |
(Surya Kant)
Judge
A809. 2018.vishal shonkar
(Sudip Ahluwalia)Judge
1. Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes2. Whether reportable? |No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.