Ita/567/2023 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S Unilog Content Solutions Pvt Ltd
High Court
08 Jul 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/567/2023 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S Unilog Content Solutions Pvt Ltd
Date of order
08 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-2019
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/567/2023 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S Unilog Content Solutions Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby SHARADAVANI BLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8 DAY OF JULY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 567 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 KORMANGALA, BANGALORE. KORMANGALA, BANGALORE.
2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7(1)(1), KORMANGALA, BANGALORE. CIRCLE 7(1)(1), KORMANGALA, BANGALORE.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. E I SANMATHI.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S UNILOG CONTENT SOLUTIONS PVT LTD NO.11, 15 CROSS, 20 MAIN,
OUTER RING ROAD, JP NAGAR 5 PHASE, BANGALORE – 560 078.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.NAGESWAR RAO D D.,ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA / INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 13/03/2023 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.852/BANG/2022, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-2019. PRAYING TO (1) DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 13/03/2023 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, C BENCH, BENGALURU, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEES CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN IT(TP)A NO. 852/BANG/2022 FOR A.Y.2018-2019 (ANNEXURE-A) AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
- 2 -
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, KRISHNA S DIXIT.J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This Appeal by the Revenue, learned counsel appearing for the Assessee submits that he is hit by the Departmental Circular No.17/2019 which prescribes certain mandatory limits for maintainability of Appeals of the kind. Learned Panel Counsel appearing for the Revenue though vociferously made his submissions, could not demonstrate that the Circular in question does not come in the way of maintaining the Appeal at hand.
2. Paragraph No.2 of the above Circular reads as
under:
“2. As a step towards further management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board that monetary limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases be enhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the table for monetary limits specified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows:
We agree with the submission of learned Panel Counsel appearing for the Assessee that the Circular comes in the way of maintaining the Appeal and therefore, decline indulgence in the matter.
Ordered accordingly and Appeal is disposed off. However, the question/s raised in the Appeal may be pressed into service in some other appropriate forum.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Bsv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.