Ita/571/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Intellinet Technologies (I) Pvt Ltd
High Court
29 Jun 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/571/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Intellinet Technologies (I) Pvt Ltd
Date of order
29 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/571/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Intellinet Technologies (I) Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-1-
-
ITA No.571/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 29 DAY QF JUNE 2ZO1/7PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.571/2013
BETWEEN :
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROADBANGALOREC.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROADBANGALORE
2.THE INCOME-TAXK OFFICERWARD-11(2), RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN.WARD-11(2), RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN.
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE ~.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)|
AND :
M/S. INTELLINET TECHNOLOGIES (I) PVT. LTD.NO.4/3, 4/4, 3 FLOOR, OXFORD TOWERS|MUNICIPAL NO.139, AIRPORT ROADBANGALORE -—- 560 O1
. RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI ARAVIND V.CHAVAN, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2J60-A OF I.T. ACTPRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SETI ASIDE THE ORDERDATED 12.07.2013 PASSED BY THE ITAIT, BANGALORE, IN M.PNO.50/BANG/2012 ETC.
THISTTACOMINGON|FORHEARING)THISDAY,H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
-
ITA No.571/2013
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)#
Heard.Learned counsel for the respondent, by.referring to the affidavit dated 24.05.2017 filed on behalf
OT|tne|respondent,submitstnat|tne|orderdated12.07.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,|
Bangalore Bench ‘A’ in the petition in M.P. No.50/Bang./2012which is impugned herein may be set aside. Accordingly, tne|
impugned order dated 12.07.2013 is set aside.
Appeal disposed of.
nkn.|
Sd/-|
JUDGE|
Sd/-
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.