Ita/57/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd
High Court
24 Jul 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/57/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd
Date of order
24 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
1984-85
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/57/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Application No.57 of 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Applicant
v/s.
M/s.Hindustan Petroleum Corporation
Ltd. .. ... Respondents
Mr.Shiv Motoria for applicant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry for respondents.
-----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ.
DATED : 24th July 2006
P.C. :
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
2. The Income Tax Tribunal, vide its order
dated 1st February 2001, had dismissed the
Reference Application made by the petitioner. The
reference was sought with respect to the
assessment made for the year 1989-90. The
Assessing Officer had granted the deduction in
favour of the respondent under Section 80-I of the
Income Tax Act, 1961. This is following an
earlier decision of the Tribunal in favour of the
assesee for the Assessment Year 1984-85. The
deduction had been granted to the Bombay Refinery
as well as the Vishakapatnam Refinery. The
submission of the Revenue is that the Marketing
Division would be treated as separately. Section
-2-
80-I of the Income Tax Act refers to any profits
and gains derived from an industrial undertaking.
Manufacturing, processing and the marketing are
part of the industrial undertaking. One cannot
separate and deny the benefit of deduction to the
Marketing Division. There is no question of law
involved. Application is rejected.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)
(V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)
(V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.