Case LawHigh Court › Ita/57/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/57/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Zila Sahkari Krishi Bank Maryadit

High Court 20 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Ita/57/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Zila Sahkari Krishi Bank Maryadit
Date of order
20 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/57/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Zila Sahkari Krishi Bank Maryadit, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: Since the monetary limit involved in this appeal pertaining to Assessment Year 2007-08 is only in the sum of Rs.11,00,000/- (which is less than 20,00,000/-), in view of the Circular dated 10[th] December, 2015, issued under the signature of Commissioner of Income Tax (AJ), C.B.D.T., Government of In...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA No.57/2012 20.1.2016 Shri Sanjay Lal, Advocate for the appellant. Since the monetary limit involved in this appeal pertaining to Assessment Year 2007-08 is only in the sum of Rs.11,00,000/- (which is less than 20,00,000/-), in view of the Circular dated 10[th] December, 2015, issued under the signature of Commissioner of Income Tax (AJ), C.B.D.T., Government of India, New Delhi, which is placed on record, this appeal is disposed of leaving questions of law open. (A.M. Khanwilkar) Chief Justice Anchal (Sanjay Yadav) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan