Ita/57/2019 Of Harish Patel v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Ita/57/2019 Of Harish Patel v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/57/2019 Of Harish Patel v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFOREHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGHON THE 1[st] OF DECEMBER, 2022
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 57 of 2019
BETWEEN:-
HARISH PATEL S/O SHRI RADHESHYAM PATEL, AGEDABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION - BUSINESS, R/O. M-31,KOTRA SULTANABAD, BHOPAL (M.P.)
(BY SHRI GAURAV SINGH THAKUR - ADVOCATE )
.....APPELLANT
AND
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -1(1), BHOPAL OFFICE AT AAYAKAR BHAWAN, 48, ARERAHILLS BHOPAL (M.P.)- 462011
(BY SHRI SANJAY LAL - ADVOCATE )
.....RESPONDENT
This appeal coming on for orders this day, JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
passed the following:
ORDER
This matter was passed over in the first round. When it was taken up inthe second round, Shri Gaurav Singh Thakur, learned counsel appears andseeks adjournment.
The record reveals that the present appeal having been filed by anassessee on 25/05/2019 is being adjourned time and again on various occasionsi.e. 12.02.2021, 23.11.2021, 08.12.2021, 24.01.2022, 10.02.2022, 18.02.2022,11.03.2022, 28.03.2022 and 13.06.2022.
On all these occasions, either no one appeared for the appellant or thecounsel who appeared for the appellant sought and was granted time to argueon admission.
Nearly three and half years have elapsed since filing of this appeal and itseems that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the same.
Accordingly, ITA stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SHEEL NAGU)JUDGEDV
(VIRENDER SINGH)JUDGE
Digitally signed by DINESH VERMA Date: 2022.12.06 13:16:01 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue