Ita/572/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S. Rajeev Gandhi Rural
High Court
05 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/572/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S. Rajeev Gandhi Rural
Date of order
05 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/572/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S. Rajeev Gandhi Rural, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 05 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BELLUNKE |INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5/2 OF J2ZO
BETWEEN:
1.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V/BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA|BENGALURU - 560 O95.BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA|BENGALURU - 560 O95.
2).THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 5(1)(1)BENGALURU,OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 5(1)(1)BENGALURU,
..APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: SANMATHI E I, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S. RAJEEV GANDHI RURALHOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED41TH FLOOR, KHB COMPLEXCAUVERY BHAVAN, K G ROADBENGALURU -560 O09PAN: AABCR5689N.,
... RESPONDENT
THIS|INCOME|TA®XAPPEAL|IS|FILED|UNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF ORDER DATED 08.03.2017 PASSED IN C.O.NO. IN_55/BANG/2016 IN ITA NO.203/BANG/2016, FOR THE.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW|AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE.FORMULATED BY THE HON BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT|AND|SETASIDE|THE|APPELLATEORDER.DATED08.03.2017 PASSED BY THE INCOME JAX APPELLATE.TRIBUNAL, ‘CCBENCH,BENGALURU,C.O.NO.IN|55/BANG/2016IN|ITANO.203/BANG/2016FOR|ASSESSMENT YEAR 2OO8-O9 AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS.APPEAL; AND TO GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED|FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
AK AK
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FORADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED|THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned Counsel for the appellants submit that|the first substantial question of law does not arise forconsideration. Hence, he restricts his submission only so.far as substantial question of law Nos.2 and 3. Hecontends that the second and third substantial questions of.law are covered by the judgment of this Court in the case.
of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER VS.|KARNATAKAURBANINFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT|AND FINANCE CORPORATION in [TA No.2418 of 2005|disposed off on 21.02.2006 reported in 284 ITR page 582.
Hence, he pleads that the appeal be disposed off.
2).The submission of the learned counsel for the|appellants is placed on record.
The appeal is accordingly disposed off. |
SD/- |JUDGE
SD/-_
JUDGE
*pgn/-|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.