Case LawHigh Court › Ita/573/2019 Of M/S Bangalore Electricit...

Ita/573/2019 Of M/S Bangalore Electricity v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 01 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/573/2019 Of M/S Bangalore Electricity v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/573/2019 Of M/S Bangalore Electricity v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in the memo.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1 DAY OF APRIL, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY ITA NO.573/2019 BETWEEN: M/S. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, KOLAR DIVISION OFFICE, CHAMPIONS REEF, S P OFFICE ROAD, K G F, KOLAR-563 117, PAN: . …APPELLANT (BY SMT. C. PADMAVATHY, PARTY-IN-PERSON) AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS CIRCLE-1(1), HMT BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 032. …RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 27/03/2019, PASSED IN ITA NO.1002, 1003, 1004 AND 1005/BANG/2018, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14, 2014-15 AND 2015-16 AND 2016-17 AND PRAYING TO (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT (B) DIRECT THE TRIBUNAL TO CONSIDER THE ISSUES NOT ADJUDICATED BY THEM AND TO THAT EXTENT HOLD THAT THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL IS BAD IN LAW, IN THE COMMON ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU ‘A’ BENCH IN ITA NO.1002, 1003, 1004 AND 1005/BANG/2018 DATED 27/03/2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 AND 2016-17 RESPECTIVELY, ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE OBSERVATION OF THE TRIBUNAL THAT CERTAIN OTHER ISSUES WERE NOT ACADEMIC AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DAY, JUDGMENT Smt. C. Padmavathy, Deputy General Manager of BESCOM (CT & GST), who appeared in person has fairly stated before this Court that the appellant-Company has approached the Department under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. 2. A memohas been filed by the Deputy General Manager, praying for withdrawal of the appeals as the appellant-Company has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme with liberty to seek revival, if need arises. 3. The memo is accepted. 4. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in the memo. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE TL
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan