Ita/574/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S. Rajeev Gandhi Rural Housing
High Court
05 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/574/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S. Rajeev Gandhi Rural Housing
Date of order
05 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/574/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S. Rajeev Gandhi Rural Housing, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 05 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BELLUNKE |INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5/4 OF 2ZOL
BETWEEN:
1.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V/BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA|BENGALURU -560 O95.BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA|BENGALURU -560 O95.
2).THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5(1)(1).BENGALURU,
_.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: SANMATHI E I, ADVOCATE)
AND©
M/S. RAJEEV GANDHI RURAL HOUSINGCORPORATION LIMITED41TH FLOOR, KHB COMPLEXCAUVERY BHAVAN, K G ROADBENGALURU -560 OO9PAN: AABCR5689O0N.
... RESPONDENT
THIS|INCOME|TA®XAPPEAL|IS|FILED|UNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF|ORDERDATED08.03.2701 PASSED|IN|ITANO.204/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR-2012-13, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO DECIDE THE)FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER.QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE|HON BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE!APPELLATE ORDER DATED O08.03.7201/7 PASSED BY TINCOME|TAXAPPELLAIETRIBUNAL,‘CIBENCH,BENGALURU IN ITA NO.204/BANG/2016 FOR ASSESSMENT|YEAR: 2012-13 AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL; AND TO}GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE|INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
AK AK
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR)ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED|THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Tne learned Counsel for the appellants submit tnatthe first substantial question of law does not arise for)consideration. Hence, ne restricts nis submission only so)far as substantial question of law Nos.2 and 3. £4Hecontends that the second and third substantial questions oflaw are covered py the judgment of this Court in the case|of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER VS.|
KARNATAKAURBANINFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT|AND FINANCE CORPORATION in [TA No.2418 of 2005|disposed off on 21.02.2006 reported in 284 ITR page 582.
Hence, he pleads that the appeal be disposed off.
2.Tne submission of the learned counsel for tne|appellants is placed on record.
The appeal is accordingly disposed off. |
SD/-_SD/-_JUDGE
JUDGE
*pgn/-|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.