Case LawHigh Court › Ita/576/2017 Of M/S. Arrow Electronics I...

Ita/576/2017 Of M/S. Arrow Electronics India Ltd v. The Additional Director Of Income Tax

High Court 02 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/576/2017 Of M/S. Arrow Electronics India Ltd v. The Additional Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/576/2017 Of M/S. Arrow Electronics India Ltd v. The Additional Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2 DAY OF MARCH 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI I. T. A. NO.576 OF 2017 BETWEEN: M/S. ARROW ELECTRONICS INDIA LTD INDIAN LIAISON OFFICE, NO.26, AKSHAYA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, 4 FLOOR, VICTORIA LAYOUT, BENGLAURU 560 047., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI SANJEEV KESKAR, AGED 53 YEARS SON OF SRI ARVIND VISHWAMBHAR KESKAR. (IN I.T(TP) A NOS.209 & 210/BANG/2011) (IN C.O.NOs.31 TO 33/BANG/2011). ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. JINITA CHATTARJEE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE) AND: THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. ….RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:31.03.2017 PASSED IN IT(TP)A No.s 209 & 210/BANG/2011 (FOR AYS 2000-01 AND 2001-02) AND CROSS OBJECTION No.s 31 TO 33/BANG/2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-03, 2003-04 AND 2004-05 AT ANNEXURE-A. PRAYING TO (a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE COMMON ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO THE APPELLANT'S APPEAL BEARING I.T.(TP) A No.s 209 & 210 /BANG/2011 (FOR AYS 2000-01 AND 2001-02) AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Ms. Jinita Chatterjee, learned counsel for Mr. S.Parthasarathi, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr. K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the Revenue. 2. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 3. Aforesaid memo is taken on record. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same. SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE RD
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan