Ita/577/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hans Raj Bansal
High Court
10 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/577/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hans Raj Bansal
Date of order
10 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/577/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hans Raj Bansal, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appl.32291/2018, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 577/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... AppellantThrough : Sh. Sanjay Kumar and Sh. Asheesh Jain, Advocates, for appellant.versusHANS RAJ BANSAL ..... Respondent
Through : None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R% 10.08.2018
C.M. APPL.32291/2018
In this appeal, the questions of law were framed on 01.12.2006 by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereafter “the Act”]. The Revenue’s grievance pertains to the deletion of amounts said to be brought to tax in the course of search assessment under Section 158BC of the Act. The amount sought to be taxed was `39,36,780/-. At that relevant point of time, the rate of tax applicable in such cases was 60% of the assessed amount. The recent circular of 11.07.2018 – which is concededly applicable, has increased the threshold to enable the Revenue to approach this Court under Section 268 of the Act to `50 lakhs. The Circular also has been made applicable to pending appeals.
In these circumstances, the appeal has been rendered infructuous on account of low tax effect. The application is accordingly allowed. ITA 577/2005
In view of the orders made in C.M. Appl.32291/2018, the appeal is dismissed. Needless to add, the question of law framed is kept open.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
AUGUST 10, 2018/ajk
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.