Ita/577/2019 Of M/S. Bangalore Electricity Supply v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/577/2019 Of M/S. Bangalore Electricity Supply v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/577/2019 Of M/S. Bangalore Electricity Supply v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in the memo.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1 DAY OF APRIL, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ITA NO.577/2019
BETWEEN:
M/S. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE), VIDHANA SOUDHA DIVISION, (WEST DIVISION), CRESCENT TOWERS, CRESCENT ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 001, PAN: .
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT. C. PADMAVATHY, PARTY-IN-PERSON)
AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS CIRCLE-1(1), HMT BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 032.
…RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 27/03/2019, PASSED IN ITA NO.1006/BANG/2018, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 AND PRAYING TO (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT (B) DIRECT THE TRIBUNAL TO CONSIDER THE ISSUES NOT ADJUDICATED BY THEM AND TO THAT EXTENT HOLD THAT THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL IS BAD IN LAW, IN THE COMMON ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU ‘A’ BENCH IN ITA
NO.1006/BANG/2018 DATED 27/03/2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012, ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE OBSERVATION OF THE TRIBUNAL THAT CERTAIN OTHER ISSUES WERE NOT ACADEMIC AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DAY,
JUDGMENT
Smt. C. Padmavathy, Deputy General Manager of
BESCOM (CT & GST), who appeared in person has fairly stated before this Court that the appellant-Company has approached the Department under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
2. A memohas been filed by the Deputy General Manager,
praying for withdrawal of the appeals as the appellant-Company has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme with liberty to seek revival, if need arises.
3. The memo is accepted.
4. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in the memo.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.