Case LawHigh Court › Ita/58/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/58/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Padinjarethala Financiers (P) Ltd

High Court 08 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/58/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Padinjarethala Financiers (P) Ltd
Date of order
08 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/58/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Padinjarethala Financiers (P) Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently we dismiss the departmentalappeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 19TH MAGHA 1931 ITA.No. 58 of 2007() -------------------- TA.28/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT. ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES) SRI. JOSE JOSEPH SC FOR IT RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT. -------------------------- M/S. PADINJARETHALA FINANCIERS (P) LTD., PUTHENPEEDIKA, TRICHUR. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Counsel engaged for respondent-assessee is no more. We do notpropose to issue notice to the assessee afresh because the issued raisedin the departmental appeal stands decided against the appellant-department in several cases. Since interest tax is payable on interestreceived on loans and advances, the Tribunal rightly held that interestreceived on deposits in post offices under the Indira Vikas Patras,Kissan Vikas Patras scheme does not attract liability under the InterestTax Act. The position is the same in respect of interest paid ondefaulted kuri subscription. Consequently we dismiss the departmentalappeal. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (P.S. GOPINATHAN) Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan