Ita/58/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Padinjarethala Financiers (P) Ltd
High Court
08 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/58/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Padinjarethala Financiers (P) Ltd
Date of order
08 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/58/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Padinjarethala Financiers (P) Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently we dismiss the departmentalappeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
MONDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 19TH MAGHA 1931
ITA.No. 58 of 2007()
--------------------
TA.28/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT.
----------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES)
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH SC FOR IT
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT.
--------------------------
M/S. PADINJARETHALA FINANCIERS (P) LTD.,
PUTHENPEEDIKA, TRICHUR.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 08/02/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 8th day of February, 2010
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Counsel engaged for respondent-assessee is no more. We do notpropose to issue notice to the assessee afresh because the issued raisedin the departmental appeal stands decided against the appellant-department in several cases. Since interest tax is payable on interestreceived on loans and advances, the Tribunal rightly held that interestreceived on deposits in post offices under the Indira Vikas Patras,Kissan Vikas Patras scheme does not attract liability under the InterestTax Act. The position is the same in respect of interest paid ondefaulted kuri subscription. Consequently we dismiss the departmentalappeal.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(P.S. GOPINATHAN)
Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.