Case Law › High Court › Ita/586/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/586/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd

High Court 31 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

31 Oct 2019

Assessment year(s)

2013-2014

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/586/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 3l[ST|]DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE. THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.586 OF 2701 BEI|WEEN 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING| SO FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU-560 095. 2DTHE INCOME-TAX OFFICER (OSD)( TDS).LIU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095.LIU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095. _. APPELLANTS. (BY SRI: DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR-SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND" M/S. KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION |CORPORATION LIMITED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE)TL AND SS DIVISION, KPTCL|MUNIRABAD-583 233. . RESPONDENT (BY SRI: SHARATH, ADVOCATE FORSRI: CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE)| THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF|ORDER.DATEDO2.05.2018|PASSED|IN|LIANO.2244/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014, VIDE ANNEXURE-C, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT|TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THEORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE.TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.2244/BANG/201/7DATED 02.05.2018, AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE.APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER.PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (OSD) (TDS), LTU,BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND TO PASS SUCH.OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT.DEEMSFITTO)GRANT.IN|THE|FACTSANDCIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF.JUSTICE AND EQUITY. OK OOK THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary. limits in terms of Circular No.1/7 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 passed by Director (1TJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New| DelNl. 2.In view of the submission made, the appeal is_ qaismissed as sucn. Sd/- JUDGE *pgn/-| Sd/-| JUDGE |

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.