Ita/588/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd
High Court
31 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/588/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd
Date of order
31 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/588/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 3l[ST|]DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE.
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.588 OF 2701
BETWEEN:
Ll.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 O95.
2DTHE INCOME-TAX OFFICER (OSD) (TDS).LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|SO FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095.
_. APPELLANTS.
(BY SRI: DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR.SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND"
M/S. KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION |CORPORATION LIMITEDEXECUTIVE CHIEF ENGINEER (ELE)MAJOR WORKS DIVISION
1 FLOOR, HADADI ROAD
OPPOSITE: BAPUJI BANKNEAR STADIUMDAVANGERE-5//7 OO5.
. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI: SHARATH, ADVOCATE FORSRI: CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE)|
THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF|ORDER.DATEDO2.05.2018|PASSED|IN|LIANO.2246/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014, VIDE ANNEXURE-C, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT|TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THEORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE.TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.2246/BANG/201/7DATED 02.05.2018, VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRM THE.ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING.THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (OSD)|(TDS), LTU, BENGALURU, AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER.SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT.TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE.CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
OK OOK
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit tnatthe appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetarylimits in terms of Circular No.1/7 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019
passed by Director (1TJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New|Delnl.
2).In view of the submission made, the appeal is
Gismissed as sucn.
Sd/-JUDGE
*pgn/-|
Sd/-|
JUDGE |
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.