Ita/589/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Kptcl
High Court
31 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/589/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Kptcl
Date of order
31 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/589/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Kptcl, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 3l[ST|]DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE.
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.589 OF 7018
BEI|WEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|SO FEET ROAD, KORMANGALALTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|SO FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 095.
2DTHE INCOME-TAX OFFICER (OSD) (TDS).LIU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095.LIU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095.
_. APPELLANTS.
(BY SRI: DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR-SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND"
M/S. KPTCLEXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE)MAJOR WORKS DIVISIONPRASARANA BHAVAN
OPPOSITE: GOPAL CEMENT FACTORY.NEAR BUDDHA VIHAR GATE.SEDAM ROADKALABURAGI-585 2272.
RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI: SHARATH, ADVOCATE FORSRI: CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE) |
THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF|ORDER.DATEDO27 .05.720PASSED|IN|ITANO.2247/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014, VIDE ANNEXURE-C, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT|TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THEORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE.TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.2247/BANG/201/7DATED 02.05.2018, AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE.APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER.PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (OSD) (TDS), LTU,BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND TO PASS SUCH.OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS’ THIS HON’BLE COURTDEEMSFITTO)GRANT.IN|THE|FACTSANDCIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF.JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
AK AK
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
C
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit tnatthe appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetarylimits in terms of Circular No.1/7 of ZO1L9 dated 08.08.201
passed by Director (1TJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New)Delnl.
2).In view of the submission made, the appeal isdismissed as such.
Sd/- _
JUDGE
*pgn/-—
Sd/-|
JUDGE |
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.