Ita/601/2016 Of M/S Mercedes Benz Research v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income - Tax
High Court
27 Nov 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/601/2016 Of M/S Mercedes Benz Research v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income - Tax
Date of order
27 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/601/2016 Of M/S Mercedes Benz Research v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income - Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: OK OOK THESE INCOME TAK APPEALS COMING ON FOR|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: C JUDGMENT In view of the memo filed in the Court today, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUON THE 2/ DAY OF NOVEMBER, 201383
BEFORE.
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN |INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.601 OF 2016ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.10/4 OF 2ZOL
BEI|WEEN
M/S MERCEDES BENZ RESEARCH |AND DEVELOPMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED(A PRIVATE COMPANY LLIMITED BY SHARESINCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956)HAVING ITS OFFICES AT:WHITEFIELD PALMS PLOT NO.S & 10EPIP ZONE, PHASE 1, WHITEFIELD ROAD.BENGALURU-560066
— APPELLANT|
(BY SRI:K.MALLAHARAO ANDSRI:S.N.ARAVINDA, ADVOCATES)
AND"
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-4(1)(2), BENGALURU
~.. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI:JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE).
THESE INCOME TAX APPEALS ARE FILED UNDERSECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF ORDER DATED 24.06.2016 PASSED IN_ IT(TP)ANO.291/BANG/2015||APPELLANT-ASSESSE §APPEAL|ANDIN|IT(TP)ANO.427/BANG/2015|RESPONDENT/ASSESSING OFFICERS APPEAL|, FOR.THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11, PRAYING THIS HON BLECOURT TO: (I) ADMIT THE INSTANT APPEAL TO ANSWER.THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW SET OUT IN PARA|29 ABOVE; (II) SET ASIDE IMPUGNED ORDER AT.ANNEXURE ‘A’ PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE|TRIBUNAL TO THE EXTENT IT REJECTS APPELLANT S|SELECTION OF COST PLUS METHOD ("CPM )/COMPARABLE UNCONTROLLED PRICE (CUP) METHOD AND UPHOLDS|SELECTION OF TRANSACTIONAL NET MARGIN METHOD.(CTNMM’) BY TPO AS MOST APPROPRIATE METHOD,(MAM) AND FURTHER TO THE EXTENT IT PERMITS)INCLUSION OF INFOSYS LIMITED AS A COMPARABLE TO.APPELLANT-ASSESSEE IN IT(TP)A NO.291/BANG/2015||APPELLANT-ASSESSE'SAPPEAL] |AND|IN|IT(TP)ANO.427/BANG/2015||RESPONDENT/ASSESSINGOFFICER'S|APPEAL |]BEFORE|THE|TRIBUNALFOR|ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11; DATED 24.06.2016 AND(III) PASS SUCH FURTHER AND OTHER ORDERS IN)FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AS THIS HON BLE COURT MAY.DEEMFITTO|GRANT,|INTHE|FACTSANDCIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, AND IN THE INTERESTS|OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
OK OOK
THESE INCOME TAK APPEALS COMING ON FOR|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
C
JUDGMENT
In view of the memo filed in the Court today, the
appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- |JUDGE
SD/-|
JUDGE
*pgn/-|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.