Ita/60/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Expert Outsource Pvt Ltd
High Court
05 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/60/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Expert Outsource Pvt Ltd
Date of order
05 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/60/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Expert Outsource Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2.Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in failing to examine and record a correct finding that obtaining STPI approval for establishment of a STP unit, on 04.08.2004 by utilizing the plant and machinery previously used for the business have been transferred to the STP unit to the extent of...
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF OCTOBER 2012
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
ITA No.60/2012
BETWEEN :
1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C R BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE
2 THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD-11 (1), C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. APPELLANTS
( By Sri. K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
M/S EXPERT OUTSOURCE PVT LTD NO.20/2, 17TH CROSS, BETWEEN 6TH & 8TH MAIN, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560055 ...RESPONDENT
ITA is filed Under Sec.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961, arising out of Order dated 31/10/2011 passed in ITA No.95/Bang/2011 by the ITAT, Bangalore.
This ITA coming on for admission this day, K.SREEDHAR RAO, J, delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
The following substantial questions of law raised in the memorandum of appeal are takenup for consideration.
1.Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in holding that the assessee would be entitled to claim deduction u/s.10A of the Act, even though the company was incorporated and had started business activities prior to obtaining approval of STPI, which was a condition precedent u/s.10A(2)(i)(b) & (c) of the Act, which was admittedly not satisfied?
2.Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in failing to examine and record a correct finding that obtaining STPI approval for establishment of a STP unit, on 04.08.2004 by utilizing the plant and machinery previously used for the business have been transferred to the STP unit to the extent of Rs.2,80,154/- which is more than 20% of the total plant and machinery of STP unit as laid down in Section 10A(2)(iii) of the Act?
This Court in ITA No.323/2010 (DD 1.3.2011) has answered
the said questions of law against the revenue.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
bkm.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.