Ita/60/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms Valley Extraction Pvt Ltd
High Court
27 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Ita/60/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms Valley Extraction Pvt Ltd
Date of order
27 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/60/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms Valley Extraction Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting ?[1] For the appellant: For the appellant:Mr.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, alongwith pending applications, if any.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLAITA No. 60 of 2016.Date of decision: 27.8.2018.
Principal Commissioner of Income TaxVersus
M/s Valley Extraction Pvt. Ltd…
…..Appellant. ...Respondent.
Coram:The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting ?[1]
For the appellant:
For the appellant:Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate withMr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate.For the respondent:Mr. R.L. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Arjun Lal, Advocate.
_________________________________________________
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
In view of Circular No. 3/2018, issued by the
Central Board of Direct Taxes, learned counsel for the
appellant seeks permission to withdraw the presentappeal. Permission granted.
2.Accordingly, petition stands disposed of as
withdrawn, alongwith pending applications, if any.
(Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice.
August 27, 2018.
(cm Thakur)
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue