Ita/602/2019 Of M/S Kemwell Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/602/2019 Of M/S Kemwell Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/602/2019 Of M/S Kemwell Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby ANUSHA VLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF JUNE, 2023 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 602 OF 2019BETWEEN:
M/S. KEMWELL PRIVATE LIMITEDA COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, KEMWELL HOUSE NO.11, TUMKUR ROAD BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. SHRIRAM CHANDAK S/O LATE MR. P.C. CHANDAK …APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. V.S. HARISH, ADVOCATE – )
AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(5) BANGALORE …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. E.I. SANMATHI, STANDING COUNSEL)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12.04.2019 PASSED IN ITA NO.209/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTIONS OF LAW OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 12.04.2019 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.209/BANG/2014 PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL.
THIS ITA, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is of the year 2019. None appeared for the appellant on 17.04.2023 and 05.06.2023. Even today, there is no representation. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
YN
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.