Ita/603/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. M/S Suraj Enterprises, Palakkad
High Court
24 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/603/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. M/S Suraj Enterprises, Palakkad
Date of order
24 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/603/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. M/S Suraj Enterprises, Palakkad, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We therefore dismiss the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
FRIDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2009 / 2ND SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 603 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.768/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
M/S.SURAJ ENTERPRISE,T.B.ROAD,PALAKKAD.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 24/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair,J.
We do not find any substantial question of law arising from theorder of the Tribunal because when the departmental valuation officeradopted CPWD valuation, the Tribunal directed valuation under thenorms of the Kerala PWD. Since construction is in Kerala, we do notthink the valuation based on PWD norms is irrelevant. In fact thedepartment has not stated why the valuation under PWD norms is notacceptable to them. We therefore dismiss the appeal.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(C. K. ABDUL REHIM)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.