Ita/608/2022 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Gmr Infrastructure Ltd
High Court
27 Feb 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/608/2022 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Gmr Infrastructure Ltd
Date of order
27 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/608/2022 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Gmr Infrastructure Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedbyNIRMALADEVILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 608 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL, CENTRAL,
3RD FLOOR C.R. BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001
2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(2) 3RD FLOOR C.R. BUILDING CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(2) 3RD FLOOR C.R. BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.DILIP M, STANDING COUNSEL FOR
SRI KV ARAVIND, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL)
AND:
1. M/S. GMR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,
NO. 25/1, SKIP HOUSE
MUSEUM ROAD BENGALURU 560 025 PAN AAB CG 8889P
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BALRAM R RAO.,ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O. NO. 111/BANG/2017 (IN ITA NO.1741/BANG/2017 DATED 25.05.2022 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 ANNEXURE- D CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(2), BENGALURU.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY P.S.
DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned advocate for the appellants has filed a memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw this appeal.
2. Memo be kept in record. Leave granted. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
3. In view of dismissal of the appeal, I.A.No.1/2023 does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.
No costs.
SD/- JUDGE
SD/- JUDGE
BS
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.