Ita/610/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Net Scout Systems
High Court
20 Nov 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/610/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Net Scout Systems
Date of order
20 Nov 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/610/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Net Scout Systems, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE JZOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2707PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD1T.A. NO.610 OF 2017
BEITWEEN
1.PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5.
BMTC COMPLEX, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE.
2D.THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.
CIRCLE 12(2), BMTC COMPLEX
KORMANGALA, BANGALORE. _
_.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. E.I1. SANMATHI, ADV.)
AND
M/S. NET SCOUT SYSTEMSSOFTWARE INDIA P. LTD.,.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS NETWORK,GENERAL SOFTWARE INDIA PVT. LTD)EMBASSY ICON, GROUND FLOOR|NO.3, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-O1PAN: AAICSOQO44E.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. SHREYA, ADV., FOR
SRI. MALLAHARAO K, ADV., FOR.SRI. NAGESWAR RAO, ADV.,)
THIS I.T.A. IS. FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OFI.L.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 15-02-201PASSED IN ITA NO.1479/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2006-07, PRAYING TO:
I. DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/ORSUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATEDBY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDETHE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 15-02-2017 PASSED BY THE|INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, A BENCH, BENGALURUAS SOUGHT FOR IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE'S CASE,IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA NO.14/79/BANG/2010 FORAY 2006-07 & GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FII,IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS IL.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.E.1.Sanmatni, learned counsel for the revenue.
Smt.Snreya, learned counsel for Mr.Mallanarao K.,|jiearned counsel for tne assessee.
2. Learned counsel for the assessee submits thatthe tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.1 Crore andtherefore, the appeal snould not be entertained at theinstance of tne revenue in view of tne Circular.No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central
Board of Direct Taxes. It Is also submitted that the.aforesaid Circular binds the revenue.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the|revenue submits that he be granted liberty to revive the|appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptions.under the aforesaid Circular dated 08.08.2019.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appealis disposed of witn liberty as prayed for by the learnedcounsel for the revenue.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-'JUDGE
RV
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.