Ita/619/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. Blaze Kuries & Loans (P) Ltd.,Irinjalaku
High Court
29 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/619/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. Blaze Kuries & Loans (P) Ltd.,Irinjalaku
Date of order
29 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/619/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. Blaze Kuries & Loans (P) Ltd.,Irinjalaku, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Issue: The question raised is whether assessee is liable to payinterest tax on receipts of interests from Indira Vikas Pathra,Kissan Vikas Pathra, interest on deposits in companies andmutual funds.
Decision: We therefore dismiss the appealfiled by the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2009 / 7TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 619 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.35/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT(S): APPELLANT:
------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT:
--------------------------------
BLAZE KURIES & LOANS (P) LTD.,
IRINJALAKUDA.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 29/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
-----------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 619 of 2009
------------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of July, 2009
J U D G M E N T
----------------------
Ramachandran Nair,J.
The question raised is whether assessee is liable to payinterest tax on receipts of interests from Indira Vikas Pathra,Kissan Vikas Pathra, interest on deposits in companies andmutual funds. Interest Tax Act provides for levy of tax oninterest received on loans or advances. The above deposits arein the nature of investments and not by way of loans or advancesmade by the assessee. Consequently the Tribunal rightlyrejected the departmental appeal against the order of the CIT(Appeals) who held that interest received by assessee does notattract liability under the Act. We therefore dismiss the appealfiled by the Revenue.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
okb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.