Case LawHigh Court › Ita/62/2016 Of E.n.gopakumar v. Commissi...

Ita/62/2016 Of E.n.gopakumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)

High Court 04 Oct 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/62/2016 Of E.n.gopakumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)
Date of order
04 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/62/2016 Of E.n.gopakumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, this Income Tax Appeal is dismissed as notpressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/12TH ASWINA, 1938 ITA.No. 62 of 2016 ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 437/COCH/2014 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, DATED 26-10-2015 APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT: --------------------------------- E.N.GOPAKUMAR EDATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PALISSERY, ANNAMANADA P.O., THRISSUR - 680741. BY ADV. SRI.O.K.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I S PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 018. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX BY Sr.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-10-2016,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ITA.No. 62 of 2016 APPENDIX APPELLANT'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A : TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.12.2011 U/S143(3) READ WITH SEC 153A FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 ANNEXURE B : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) DATED 30.5.2014. ANNEXURE C : TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER OF THE INCOME TAXAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, DATED 26.10.2015. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// ami/ P.A.TO JUDGE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANU SIVARAMAN, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- I.T.Appeal No.62 of 2016 -----------------------------------------------Dated this the 4[th] day of October, 2016 J U D G M E N T Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he hasinstructions to mention that his client is not pressing thisappeal. Hence, this Income Tax Appeal is dismissed as notpressed. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN JUDGE ami/7.10.16 Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A.to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan