Case Law › High Court › Ita/62/2019 Of Sunny Jacob Jewellers v....

Ita/62/2019 Of Sunny Jacob Jewellers v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

27 Apr 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/62/2019 Of Sunny Jacob Jewellers v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Income Tax Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 7TH VAISAKHA, 1943 ITA.No.62 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 372/2016 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: SUNNY JACOB JEWELLERSPAN AAQS3227D,CSI GOLDEN JUBILEE COMPLEX, SASTHRI ROAD,KOTTAYAM-686001,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,SHRI.SUNNY JACOB. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)SRI.V.P.NARAYANANSRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXPUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING,SASHTHRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.)R1 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON27.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Ashok Menon, J. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission towithdraw the Income Tax Appeal. Permission granted. The Income Tax Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-ASHOK MENONJUDGE sd Sd/-MURALI PURUSHOTHAMANJUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.